PETITION: LEGAL PART
Athens,
May 14, 1998
To The
Ministry of Justice Athens
PETITION
Of the Non-Governmental Organization "Anti-Nazi Initiative" regarding
the adoption of appropriate legislative and administrative measures for the
prohibition of the establishment and function of Nazi and racist organizations
in our country in compliance with the International Convention on the Elimination
of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, ratified by our country with the Presidential
Decree 494/1970. We especially and specifically refer to the Nazi organization
"Chrysi Avgi" that functions legally and participates in the elections.
The Anti-Nazi Initiative is a non-governmental organization which was formed
in June 1997 by democratic people who share a common ideological position,
they are anti-Nazi. The purpose of Anti-Nazi Initiative is to combat the phenomenon
of Nazism in our country. Its formation was the result of the deep concern
of its members about the phenomena of racism, and mainly ethno-racism, xenophobia,
anti-Semitism and intolerance, which are present in Greek society. This concern
has become more intense by the expansion of the activities of the Nazi organization
"Chrysi Avgi". These activities include the dissemination of propagandistic
material openly in favor of Hitlerism, racism and anti-Semitism, as well as,
the perpetration of a series of attacks against foreigners, members of anti-nationalist
organizations and young people whose appearance indicates democratic attitude.
The activities and function of the Nazi and racist organizations, like "Chrysi
Avgi", is contrary to the principles of the democratic constitution of
our country. The activity and propaganda of this organization has violated
and is violating the constitutionally endorsed individual rights of foreigners
living in our country, of Greek citizens who are members of national minorities,
as well as of Greek citizens in general.
We refer to racist, anti - Semitic and pro-Hitler declarations of the organization
published in the official printed material of "Chrysi Avgi", that
is, the weekly newspaper and the monthly magazine. In particular:
Newspaper titled "Chrysi Avgi", May 5, 1995, from article about
the anniversary for the great anti-fascist victory of peoples against Hitler:
"We are sorry that this newspaper has nothing to celebrate on May 8.
On the contrary, considering today's situation of the world, considering the
decay, the hypocrisy, the beastly consuming mania, and the intellectual devastation
prevailing everywhere, it wonders about the Truth of the repeated tale that
the good guys won in the last war".
Magazine "Chrysi Avgi", Issue No 67, page 32-26. Article titled:
"The Zionists Poison on the Screen": "The end of Second World
War which came with the defeat of the European Forces, finds the Jew tyrant,
dominant and powerful. The development of technical means make cinema powerful
weapon of political propaganda… Films for every taste and any intellectual
level, provided that they slander the Third Reich and all of the values upon
which it grew and which it defended until the final fall (Honor, Bravery,
Morality, Faith, Patriotism, Racial Purity, Motherhood, Family). …The myth
taboo of our times, the "Holocaust", is dealt with general distrust,
the official view for the Second World War undergoes the test of doubt and
those who were yesterday "war criminals", "insane dictators",
gain sympathies - a last year's gallop in France about Hitler's popularity
is indicative".
Magazine "Chrysi Avgi", Issue No 68, 20/1/1992, page 7-13. Article
titled: "To the Unknown Hero", where they extol as "patriot-fighter",
Sevastianos Fulidis, a Greek collaborator of Germans Nazi and their spy in
Greece, coming from the former Soviet territories in the Black Sea, major
of the SS, of the "European Army", as "C. A." call them:
"Fulidis was above all a conscious Greek national-socialist, heart and
soul devoted to the Great Struggle against communist tyranny. He was not just
an opportunist, an arriviste mercenary ready to escape at the first difficulties.
He knew that with his activities, he served Europe, Germany, but above all
Greece…", where at the Second World War, collaboration with the Nazis
is suggested as a "patriotic attitude".
Magazine "Chrysi Avgi", Issue No 68, 20/1/1992, page 16-17. Article
titled: "Racism now, for the Fatherland and the People!". "As
National Socialists we are interested for the rights, achievements, and demands
of the Greek worker, but first of all we view the matter from the racial aspect.
We do not just confine ourselves to the economic field and to the subject
of labor, because the fundamental issue for us is that foreign workers with
their presence in our Fatherland represent a danger for our racial purity.
Our society, our civilization, our evolution in the Future, derives from the
unique special attributes inherited from our ancestors. The inexhaustible
river of Greek Blood breeds this indissoluble band of blood with History.
…No Asian or African has either understood, or will understand our civilization,
he has not fought, and he will not fight for our rights, he has not hated
or will hate our enemies. How can he, then, claim a share to our Blood, our
History and our society: SAME COUNTRY, SAME BLOOD!…
…Against the system of capitalistic exploitation that squeezed dry Greek and
foreign workers in its gearing in order to satisfy its profiteering greed,
against the anti-human, leveled and declined theories of communism considering
workers as proletarians who have no country, against all those we, the Greek
National-Socialists of Chrysi Avgi, irrevocably Racists and proud for our
real Socialistic identity bravely shout: KICK THEM FOREIGN WORKERS OUT OF
GREECE! LONG LIVES THE GREEK WORKER! RACISM NOW FOR THE FATHERLAND AND THE
PEOPLE!".
Magazine "Chrysi Avgi", Issue No 69, 25/2/1992, page 38. Article
titled: "Signs of the Times", commenting an article from the magazine
"Tahydromos" on the racism in Greece: "Regarding the fear expressed
from Tahydromos, "whether the time for a Greek Lepen has come",
and "that Hitler is waiting in the corner", we assure them that
soon, we Greek National-Socialists, will realize their nightmare ".
Magazine "Chrysi Avgi", Issue No 70, 2/4/1992, page 39-40. Article
titled: "National is what is true": "They ignore our real brothers,
Pomakous, while, at the same time, they urge us to consider as Greek all the
Muslims in Thrace, and they hypocritically tell us that our only difference
is religion. A journey to Thrace is enough for us to ascertain how much this
assumption is far from truth, since the tremendous racial and cultural difference
between them, of Turkish origin, and us Greeks becomes obvious at a glance.
It is the same difference existing between the gypsies and us. Each Greek
visiting the communities of those of Turkish origin spontaneously experiences
the feeling of repulsion and the strong bad smell. …We are talking about original
Turks, Mongolians, gypsy humanoids…
…We Greek National-Socialists shout bravely, that those two worms, Sadik and
Faikoglou, must be expelled from the Greek Parliament, and to be sent, them
and the rest of the pack, back to where they came from, the hostile and dry
Mongolian steppes. Greek patriots, how much longer we will warm up such snakes
in our land, knowing that they will grab the first opportunity to try their
poisonous bite with their stinky mouths, on the body of our ancestor's land".
Magazine "Chrysi Avgi", Issue No 92. "In modern history, the
revolution of our Ideas, the "National Revolution", that was realized
during the interwar period, in several European Countries with various results,
is the last and youngest Revolution of History. Its realization sealed the
crucial theoretical turn that was achieved by the White Race and its nations
during the process of History. This theoretical turn created the regime of
4th August, the National Socialism, the Fascism, the Falangism and other European
Nationalist Regimes. It also established the foundations for the reconstruction
of the Forces of Tradition of today and tomorrow! We ought to pace in this
path during these "resolute years". We the defeated of yesterday,
shall only be the Winners of tomorrow! Because we feel the visions, we believe
in destiny and we fight for the Nation, the People and our Race. For the continuity
of Life and Freedom of evolution. We are against the darkness of Zionist "enlightenment",
guards of the ancestral inheritance and unrepented defenders of the ideas
of the Greek World's eternal beauty".
From the Second Congress of the People's League of Chrysi Avgi, in Athens
April 11-12, 1992: "The roots of most of the problems of our country,
are found at the period of the Second World War, in which Greece involved
serving interests foreign to the Nation, paying a high price of blood, in
order to be found on the side of the victorious Allies".
Articles of this kind are included in all of the issues of "Chrysi Avgi".
We quote the most characteristic extracts. We will conclude with extracts
from their last issue:
Newspaper "Chrysi Avgi", Issue No 235, April 3-9 1998, in article
titled: "The ancestral achievements, invitation to action", we read:
The level of each individual is directly related to our National-Racial level…
…The worst ending for us (that is, for Hellenism) is the intention of Zionism,
as described in the famous "Protocols of Zion". Destruction of Racial
Nations, with total subjection to the ruling of the only, the chosen race
of Jahveh. The chosen people of Israel! The other ending is our natural Racial
and National answer. The loud and revolutionary "NO", that will
be stated by the Greek people, coming out of our stern chests, against the
rage of the chosen race of Israel, against the Lernean Hydra of Zionism. Fire!
The reborn Greek Hero, like Phoenix reborn from its ashes, the ashes of the
Herculian Race, already holds the burning Torch and the Double-Edged Axe!
LONG LIVE VICTORY!"
The activity of the nazi organization "Chrysi Avgi" goes beyond
racial declarations. It expands to a series of brutal and unprovoked attacks
against democrats, anti-nationalistic organizations and immigrants, for which
there are no judicial decisions but there are signed accusations against "Chrysi
Avgi" which appeared in the newspapers. We herein refer to some of these
cases:
On April 7, 1996, ten members of the political organization OSE (Organization
for the Socialistic Revolution) were attacked at Kypseli, Athens, while handing
out their newspaper "Ergatiki Allilegyi" and leaflets for an open
discussion organized by above group. The office of "Chrysi Avgi"
was found at a close distance from the location of the assault. OSE accused
"the neo-Nazis of Chrysi Avgi" for the attack by relative press
announcement. Five members of OSE were transferred to hospital.
In the beginning of September 1996, in Chania, Crete, two Greeks immigrants
from the former Soviet territories in the Black Sea and one Greek from South
Albania were attacked. The Students' Group "PAMK" -students' movement
politically annexed to "PASOK" reported the assault. The relative
press announcement mentions that the perpetrators were members of the national-racist
organization "Chrysi Avgi" who wrote the name of their organization
on the wall.
On January 31, 1997, "Chrysi Avgi" attacked two members of the left
organization "OAKKE" (Organization for the Reconstruction of the
Greek Communist Party). OAKKE accused the Nazi organization by press announcement.
The members of above organization, G. Ioannidis, worker at shipyards, and
P. Gournas, student, were wounded and transferred to hospital. The Town Councils
of Drapetsona and Keratsini also condemned the assault with specific reference
to the "fascists of Chrysi Avgi".
In 1996, in view of the voting for members of the Greek Parliament, and during
the pre-election period, members of "Chrysi Avgi" smashed the kiosk
of the participating political parties "OAKKE"-"Ouranio Toxo",
with informative material.
In January 1998, at 7.30 p.m., A. Kalofolias, a 34-year old member of the
Band "Last Drive" was attacked by three Nazi who hit him in the
face with an iron bar. When he fell on the pavement, they started to hit his
face against the marble in front of many eyewitnesses. Even when Kalofolias
managed to crawl to the entrance of a shop, in order to escape from the murderous
attack, they followed him and kept on hitting him in front of an employee.
Then the three Nazis went in the block of flats where the office of "Chrysi
Avgi" was found. These facts come from the testimonies of the victim
and eyewitnesses.
On February 1998, at 9 in the morning, at Omonia Sq., in the center of Athens,
a group of Nazis, members of "Chrysi Avgi" beat up a 25 year old
Albanian, Armout A. The Nazis forced the victim to read aloud an extract of
an article from a newspaper, condemning their activity. According to the victim
(interview at the newspaper "Kiriakatiki Eleftherotypia"): "I
was walking down Omonia Sq., when 4 persons with saved heads and military
uniforms stopped me. They were holding a newspaper. "Do you know how
to read Albanian worm?", they said, and they started to beat me. They
were hitting me for about 10 minutes and in between they made me read aloud
the titles: "Supporters of "Chrysi Avgi" beat up foreigners
systematically" or "the snake's egg has already been hatched in
Greece". Thus, I learnt from first hand, who beat me and why".
These assaults of "Chrysi Avgi" are the implementation of its declarations.
The most substantial and comprehensive expression of racist ideology is violence.
The supporters and defenders of racist ideas consist a threat for political
democracy, for life, for honor, and for citizens’ freedom. The government
does not prohibit nazi activities, thus permitting the unpunished, the raw
violation of the constitutionally protected right to absolute protection of
life, freedom and honor of everybody living within the borders of the Greek
State without distinction as to nationality, race, language and religious
or political convictions (Constitution Article 5, paragraph 2).
Our country is obliged to take legislative measures in order to prohibit the
function and the activities of the organization "Chrysi Avgi", which
openly declares its nazi and racist ideology, in line with the International
Convention On the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD),
signed on March 7, 1966 and ratified with the Legislative Decree 494/1970
(Government’s Gazette A’, 77, April 3, 1970). According to the Constitution,
Article 28, para. 1, the International Convention, after its ratification,
consists inseparable part of the Greek national Law and is superior to any
other contrary provision of the law.
The Article 4 of CERD, constitutes the obligation of the States to prohibit
the racist organisations and to decree sanctions for the racist activities.
We quote Article 4 of CERD: "States Parties condemn all propaganda and
all organizations which are based on ideas or theories of superiority of one
race or group of persons of one color or ethnic origin, or which attempt to
justify or promote racial hatred and discrimination in any form, and undertake
to adopt immediate and positive measures designed to eradicate all incitement
to, or acts of, such discrimination and, to this end, with due regard to the
principles embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the rights
expressly set forth in Article 5 of this Convention, inter alia:
Shall declare an offence punishable by law all dissemination of ideas based
on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial discrimination, as well
as acts of violence or incitement to such acts against any race or group of
persons of another color or ethnic origin, and also the provision of any assistance
to racist activities, including the financing thereof;
Shall declare illegal and prohibit organizations, and also organized and all
other propaganda activities, which promote and incite racial discrimination,
and shall recognize participation in such organizations or activities as an
offence punishable by law;
Shall not permit public authorities or public institutions, national or local,
to promote or incite racial discrimination".
Interpretive APPROACH OF Article 4 of CERD
article 4 constitutes the obligation of the State to prohibit racist organizations
like "Chrysi Avgi". According to the relative provision those organizations
which "promote and incite racial discrimination" must be prohibited.
We must therefore specify, first, the definition of racial discrimination
according to CERD and second, which actions are considered to be incitement
and encouragement to racial discrimination. We will prove at the same time,
that on the basis of the aforesaid, "Chrysi Avgi" must be prohibited.
In order to interpret Article 4, we will refer to the general rule of interpretation
of Treaties (Article 31, para. 3, of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties)
according to which, the International Law as it is embodied in legislation
and practice must be taken into account.
Article 1 of CERD quotes: "the term "racial discrimination"
shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on
race, color descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or
effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise,
on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms, in the political,
economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life".
We will also refer to the posterior Declaration of UNESCO, 1978 for race and
racial prejudice. The Declaration does not provide the legal definition of
racism, but it contains a detailed list of manifestations of racism: theories
supporting that there are inferior and superior racial or national groups,
the justification alone of these theories, racist ideology, prejudiced attitudes,
attitudes indicating discrimination, practices leading to racist inequality,
and, finally, legislation and practice of discrimination (Article 2).
One of the aforementioned quotations from the printed material of "Chrysi
Avgi" includes the command "Racism Now!".
Yet, the basic proof for the racist character of "Chrysi Avgi" is
the open support of National Socialism: "This theoretical turn created
the regime of 4th August, the National Socialism, the Fascism, the Falangism
and other European Nationalist Regimes. It also established the foundations
for the reconstruction of the Forces of Tradition of today and tomorrow! We
ought to pace in this path during these "resolute years"".
When we refer to racist theories, we must refer mainly to the general chapter
under the title "National Socialism" [1]. This doctrine is described
in Hitler's book "MEIN KAMPF", which was rightly considered to be
the "Bible of Racism". According to Hitler’s theory, the "White
Truth", the superior races must replace the inferior races. The White
Race has the mission to civilize the world. The Jewish people attack the white
race. Where there is wickedness, according to Hitler, a Jew is involved. The
white blood must be kept pure. Miscegenation is the ultimate sin".
It is generally accepted by International Law and in case law, that the defenders
of National Socialism and Hitlerism are the most fanatic supporters of racial
discrimination, "the superiority of the White Race", "the pureness
of blood". The theory of Hitlerism, being the most perfected racial theory,
is the raw violation of all human rights. It is for this reason, that after
the Second World War, humanity as a whole proceeded, through the body of International
Community, the United States Organization, to enter into a series of conventions
for the protection of human rights so as to prevent their infringement by
a new Hitler, by a new imperialistic racist policy and, also, by the colonialist
racism.
It is characteristic that the preamble of CERD refers that the States Parties
are convinced that any doctrine of superiority based on racial differentiation
is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous,
and that there is no justification for racial discrimination, in theory or
in practice, anywhere.
The second part of our interpretive approach regards actions that are considered
to lead to incitement and encouragement to racial discrimination. The racist
action is any kind of violence that violates the principle of equality between
people without distinction as to race, color, nationality or ethnic origin,
a principle protected by our Constitution (article 4 and 5 para. 2), the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 (Articles 1 and 2), the European Convention
for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Article 14),
and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Article 26).
According to this definition, the following actions can be considered as promotion
of and incitement to racist action: any kind of racist propaganda and support
of racial discrimination, every invitation to the public to adopt the positions
about racial or/and ethnic superiority.
The Nazi State of Hitler implemented racist ideology, building its foundations
on violence against the "inferior races" (and especially the Jews),
and the "inferior nations". Another form of the racist state was
the colonies, where the enforcement of racism was based on the relationship
between the colonialist nation and the natives. The system of APARTHEID was
one of the last and most hideous examples of this kind of racism. APARTHEID
suppressed all human rights for people belonging to the black race and was
condemned by international community [2]. Consequently, violence is the substantial
element of racism.
At this point we will refer to the definition given to racism by sociologist
Albert Memi [3]: "Racism is the generalized and resolute development
of biological differences real or imaginary in favor of the prosecutor and
against his victim in order to justify his privileges or his assault… Racist
attitude is characterized by the effort made by the racist to legalize his
assault or to keep attacking, legalizing his privilege. This assault or privilege
may be present or potential".
The racist will always express his ideology with assault, with violence in
order to confirm his "superiority". The theory of racial superiority
is used in order to legalize violence that has already been exercised or that
will be exercised. It is the basis of violence.
For these reasons the democratic constitution must not allow the expression
of racist positions, because thus illegal violence is protected. This attitude
leads, in practice, to the abolition of the principles of the democratic constitution.
THE BAN ON THE RACIST ORGANIZATIONS AND THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
The mandate of the International Anti-Racist Convention, solely on the basis
of a strict interpretation of its provisions, without examining its object
and purpose, might be considered to be contrary to the freedom of opinion
and expression (article 14 para. 1 of the Constitution, article 10 of ECHR)
and the principle of free association of political parties. These principles,
actually, impose the duty of a democratic society to allow the free opposition
of ideas and speech.
Nevertheless, in a democratic society, there must be repressive measures against
illegal violence and the ideology of violence. The praisers of crimes against
the life, the honor, and the freedom of citizens, like murder, torture, rape,
drug dealing, pederasty, are punished with sanctions in States with democratic
institutions. The racist position, especially the support of Hitlerism and
National Socialism is not only praise to such crimes perpetrated in the past,
but also, and this is most important, provokes to the perpetration of new
crimes. At this point, we must clarify that the Nazi crime is not a political
crime as terrorist action might be considered in certain cases in the modern
States (as action of a national liberation movement, or of an anarchic or
anti-constitutional movement). The Nazi crime is about brutal racial cleansing,
ethnic cleansing, about actions absolutely condemned by humanity.
In this light the object and purpose of CERD and all other legislative and
administrative repressive measures taken by the democratic States of Europe
becomes clear.
We quote relative extracts from the Report of the Committee of the European
Parliament on Racism in Europe, 1985 [4]: "The role of law and relative
legal mechanisms must not be either underestimated nor overestimated. We must
not forget that every measure, positive, preventive or repressive, aiming
at the elimination of racial discrimination within the sphere of a democratic
constitution must, finally, be based on a rule of law. From this aspect, law
is an indispensable and ubiquitous instrument".
There is absolute need for a repressive law against racist propaganda and
racist action since these forms of activity result to the abolition of the
fundamental freedoms of human, the protection of which is the duty of all
democratic States.
The freedom of expression must be restricted when other legitimate rights
are threatened [5]. It is necessary to counterbalance the right to freedom
of expression and the legitimate right to be violated. During this process
we must take into account the special importance of the freedom of opinion
for democracy. Two criteria are necessary: First, a legitimate right protected
by the Constitution must be violated. Second, the limitation of freedom of
opinion must aspire to the repression of illegal activity.
The freedom of racist expression infringes the right to absolute protection
of life, honor and freedom of those who live within the borders of the Greek
State, without distinction as to race, color, descent, or ethnic origin (article
5, para. 2 of the Constitution), and also, the principle of equality (article
4 of the Constitution). This principle applies only to the Greek citizens,
but the concept of the elimination of all forms of discrimination is included
as substantial element in the context of each individual right. CERD, ratified
by our country, declares illegal the racist expression.
The protection of the right to freedom of expression enforces the prohibition
of racist expression. Article 10 of ECHR, nowadays considered to be the European
Constitution, constitutes the absolute protection of freedom of expression,
including freedom of opinion, reception and dissemination of information and
ideas, without interference from public authorities. Nevertheless, the exercise
of this right is subject to legitimate restrictions, which are necessary to
a democratic society for the achievement of certain goals (para. 2). WOLFGANG
STRASSER, member of the Secretariat of the European Committee on Human Rights
[6], argues on this subject as follows: "Article 10 must be considered
as a key-provision for the stability of democracy. Therefore, its interpretation
is broad and liberal, based on the principle that even the information or
ideas which are annoying or shocking to the public must be allowed and the
provisions for exclusion must be interpreted limitedly.
From this aspect, two cases in which the Article 10 is invoked must be distinguished:
By persons whose freedom of expression has been restricted because they supported
ideas of extreme nationalism, racial hatred, anti-Semitism e.t.c. In this
field, the Committee generally considers that the restrictions imposed are
justified either on the basis of Article 10 para. 2, or, in rare cases, of
Article 17 of the Convention.
By persons whose purpose was to express criticism against manifestations of
extreme nationalism, racial hatred, anti-Semitism e.t.c. and whose freedom
of expression was restricted usually after relative application of the opponents:
from this point of view the instruments of the Convention protect the freedom
of expression, provided that the criticism is relative and equivalent ".
It is obvious that the freedom of expression in a democratic society requires
the implementation of article 4 of CERD.
The same mandate is included in Article 20 para. 2 of the Covenant of the
United Nations Organization on Civil and Political Rights, which Greece has
ratified and entered into force in August 5, 1997. According to Article 20
para. 2 the States Parties must prohibit any encouragement of racial, ethnic
or religious hatred leading to incitement to discrimination.
Since the prohibition of the individual expression of the propapagandist of
racist ideology must be imposed, the organized expression, the illegal Nazi
group, the "party" of Nazi must also be prohibited. Therefore, "Chrysi
Avgi" is not protected by Article 19 of the Constitution, establishing
free association of political parties. It is not a party as protected by this
institution in a democratic state but an organized group of persons who commit
a criminal offence only by participating, because they jointly praise the
crimes of Hilerism during the Second World War and provoke to repetition ("Regarding
the fear expressed from Tahydromos, "whether the time for a Greek Lepen
has come", and "that Hitler is waiting in the corner", we assure
them that soon, we Greek National-Socialists, will realize their nightmare
"). The recognition of the right to free association for a Nazi party
is equivalent with the demand for recognition of the same right for the rapers
(or the defenders of rape), the murderers (or the defenders of murder), the
pederasts e.t.c.
THE PROVISIONS OF CERD ARE JUS COGENS
The enforcement of the provisions of CERD is required for the protection of
our democratic constitution, and because, in this way, our country will fulfill
its constitutional obligation to promote harmonious relationships with third
countries and to contribute to the establishment of co-existence in peace
and friendship.
In the preamble of CERD we read: "Reaffirming that discrimination between
human beings on the grounds of race, color or ethnic origin is an obstacle
to friendly and peaceful relations among nations and is capable of disturbing
peace and security among peoples and the harmony of persons living side by
side even within one and the same State".
In the Declaration of UNESCO on Racial Discrimination, it is mentioned that
racism prevents the development of its victims, corrupts those supporting
racist ideas, divides nations within the same State, is an obstacle to international
co-operation and provokes political enmity to peoples. Racism is a major source
of disorder in the world against peaceful co-existence.
A State that allows racial discriminations endangers not only democracy in
the interior but, also, friendly relations with third parties. The acceptance
of superior and inferior races, superior and inferior peoples, superior and
inferior nations can only create enmity that, in the right moment, may be
the cause of a war and ethnic cleansing with the most barbaric characteristics.
The importance of combating racism is recognized from all democratic States
for all the aforementioned reasons. Therefore, the provisions of CERD are
Jus Cogens according to Article 53, of the Vienna Convention on the Law of
Treaties: "A Peremptory Norm of General International Law is a Norm accepted
and recognized by the International Community of States as a whole, as a Norm
from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by subsequent
Norm of General International Law having the same character".
This character of CERD makes the enforcement of its provisions obligatory
for all States Parties with the greatest consistency.
We must stress here that CERD, as well as all International Covenants on Human
Rights concluded within the sphere of UN, have the force of an International
Constitution. These texts participate to the formation of the constitutional
order in the interior of each State Member. Because of their universal character,
they are considered to be the Constitutional Law of International Community,
and the cultural inheritance of humanity.
ANTI-RACIST LEGISLATION OF THE GREEK STATE
The Greek Criminal Law in compliance with CERD, has declared racist action
and expression criminal offence with the promulgation of Act 927/79 (amended
by Art. 24 of Act 1419/1984) against acts or activities leading to racial
discrimination. This Act only typically complies with CERD. It really ignores
CERD, since only the individual racial expression and action is declared illegal,
and not organized expression and action.
It should be stressed here that, under the present Section 4 of Act 927/1979,
ONLY THE INJURED PARTY might bring an action in a case with racist connotations.
Neither, the Public Prosecutor, nor any interested association or individual
may bring judicial proceedings.
The Sanctions provided are inconsiderable. They do not surpass two years imprisonment
while the person who incites to racist violence or express racist ideas might
go away only with a fine.
For all of the above reasons there is no case law on the basis of this Act.
Taking into consideration that Nazi organization functions for ten years in
Greece, it is obvious that the victims are intimidated feeling that there
is no protection from the State.
Actually, there is no Greek anti-racist legislation. There will be anti-racist
legislation only with the promulgation of an Act declaring illegal Nazi organizations.
It is taken for granted that, in any case, Section 4 of Act 927/1979 must
be supplemented in order to allow the Public Prosecutor, and any interested
association or individual to bring judicial proceedings.
THE EUROPEAN ANTI-RACIST LEGISLATION
The European Commission through its institutional bodies (Parliament, Council
e.t.c.) has shown great sensitivity on the matter of anti-racist measures.
We will refer to some of these measures taken by each Member State:
In Germany, Article 9(2) prohibits bodies whose aims or activities contravene
penal, constitutional or international law. This Article has been applied
mainly against racist organizations. In 1989, the Federal Minister for Home
Affairs prohibited the "Nationale Sammlung", and in 1992 several
racist and right-wing organizations, such as the "Deutsche Alternative"
and "Nationalistische Front" were also prohibited. The Federal Administrative
Court confirmed the legality of prohibiting the Nationalistische Front in
1993. The Federal Constitutional Court with two decisions in 1994, ruled positively
on the constitutionality of Articles 130 and 185 of German Penal Code. These
Articles criminalize denial of the Holocaust (Auschwitz lie). The Court held
that the denial of the Holocaust did not constitute freedom of expression
for two reasons: a) because it insulted the Jewish people and b) it had been
shown that this denial was not true.
France has incorporated CERD into national law
In Italy, Article 7 of Law 205/1993 on "urgent measures on racial discrimination",
provides for the preventive suspension of the activities of organizations
which may reasonably be supposed to be of a racist nature. In the extreme
these organizations may be dissolved and their property confiscated.
In the Nederlands, an Act of 1989, provides that racist organizations may
be prosecuted and dissolved. The Public Prosecutor is authorized to enforce
these sanctions provided that the leaders of such groups have been convicted
for violation of the Penal Code.
In Portugal, Article 46(4) of the Constitution prohibits all armed groups
of a military or paramilitary nature as well as those preaching fascist ideas.
In 1994, the Constitutional Court of Portugal examined whether the National
Action Movement should be dissolved, after relative application of the Public
Prosecutor, on the basis of above provision. The Court did not give a ruling
on this issue because, in the meantime, the group had in fact dissolved. However,
the Court did give various opinions on the goals of this organization.
According to the Court, the organization and its active members propounded
the ideology of race, implying their opposition to the co-existence of different
races in a single state and racial miscegenation, and disseminating this ideology
in such a way as to incite xenophobia and racial hatred. The organization's
publications featured well - known German National Socialists, Italian fascists
and Portuguese Corporatists. Enlisted members used the Nazi salute and displayed
the swastika.
ENGAGEMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE GREEK STATE FOR COMBATING RACISM AND XENOPHOBIA
RESOLUTIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL
i. On May 29, 1990, the European Council adopted a resolution on the fight
against racism and xenophobia. In this resolution, the Council calls upon
Member States to, inter alia:
Recognize (in case they have not yet done so), the procedure for individual
petitions referred to Article 14 of CERD (2b). (Greece has not recognized
Article 14).
To resolute application of laws aimed at preventing or curbing racist or xenophobic
acts and the preparation of such laws by those Member States which have not
yet done so (2c).
ii. In July 1996, the Council adopted a resolution for common action against
racism and xenophobia inviting Member States to closer judicial co-operation
through preparation of strict legislation and penalties.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FOR MEMBER STATES
The report of European Parliament on racism and xenophobia (1989-1990) included
recommendations 52, 65 and 68 according to which, Member States should: a)
Promulgate Acts enabling associations and other interested parties to bring
actions in Court against racist acts, b) Form mechanisms monitoring application
of International Conventions and Directives, and c) Adopt strict legislative
measures especially concerning the deprivation of civil rights from person
convicted for racist activity.
RECOMMENDATION OF EUROPEAN COMMISSION AGAINST RACISM AND INTOLERANCE
The Report of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI)
for Greece, refers that Greece must recognize Article 14 of CERD.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE FOR THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
The Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination had persistently
asked from all the States Parties to comply with Articles 2-7 of CERD, specifically
referring to Article 4 para. a, b and c, regardless of the existence of racial
discrimination in the interior of each State.
The Committee has affirmed that the application of these rules is obligatory
to all Member States.
It is obvious, on the basis of the aforesaid, that the Greek State does not
implement the provisions of CERD, and does not comply with European practice
and legislation on the matters of racism. The legality of the function and
activity of the Nazi organization "Chrysi Avgi" in our country,
means that the Greek State allows the cultivation of a political environment
which bears the immediate danger of war, dictatorship and fascism.
For all of the above reasons
WE HEREBY ASK
That "Chrysi Avgi" be declared illegal
That the association, function and activity of any other racist group be prohibited
in compliance with Article 4 of CERD
That our country recognize the procedure for individual petitions referred
to Article 14 of CERD (2b)
That the Act 927/79 be amended so that the Public Prosecutor, and any interested
association or individual may bring judicial proceedings, and strict sanctions
are imposed, and that the same Act be supplemented with the provision of penal
punishment for the denial of the crimes defined in Article 6 of the Organization
of International Military Court attached to the Covenant of London of April
8, 1945, to the extent that this denial suggests contemptuous or diminishing
attitude towards a group of persons defined on the basis of color, race, religion
or ethnic origin or descent
That strict legislation is promulgated in compliance with Articles 2-7 of
CERD
Sincerely yours,
On behalf of the Anti-Nazi Initiative
REFERENCES
G. Tenekides: "L' Action des Nations Unies Contre Discrimination Raciale",
"Recuil De Cours", International Law Academy, vol. 168 (1980), pages
269-487
CERD, Article 3
Encyclopedia Universalis, vol. 13, 1972, pages 915-916
European Parliament, Report of the Committee investigating the phenomenon
of the Uprise of Fascism and Racism in Europe, Dim. Eurygenis, December 1985.
Constitutional Law, Individual Rights, P. D. Dagtoglou, Sakoulas Publications
1991
Journal "Nomiko Vima", vol. 45, Issue 6, September-October 1997
The data for the legislation of European Countries are taken from a) Comparative
Study on the legal instruments to combat racism and xenophobia in Member States,
of the Directorate - General for Employment, Industrial Relations and Social
Affairs, b) Report of the Committee of the European Parliament investigating
the phenomenon of racism and xenophobia, 1989-1990